Posted by Paul Burrowes on Wednesday, November 12th, 2025 8:43am.

That oversized house on a sunny Santa Cruz Street — the one with the garden full of memories — isn’t just a home. For many baby boomers’ real estate owners, it’s a nest egg, a lifetime of savings and decisions wrapped into one address. But now, a quirk in tax law is doing something unexpected: it’s locking many long-time Santa Cruz owners into homes they’d rather leave. That lock? capital gains tax Santa Cruz realities and the math that follows a sale.
This post explains how capital gains tax home selling rules are freezing the market in Santa Cruz, what it means for real estate buyers and sellers, the local communities, and practical steps you — whether buyer, seller, or advisor — can use to navigate the next year (and beyond). I’ll ground the numbers, show you the tradeoffs, and answer the questions buyers and sellers in Santa Cruz ask most.
You might think the tight housing supply in Santa Cruz comes from zoning limits, coastal preservation rules, or simply the appeal of beachside living. Those are part of the story — but a bigger, quieter factor is tax policy.
The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 (TRA97) established the current capital gains exemptions California homeowners rely on:
These exclusions apply when you’ve lived in your home for two of the last five years. Before TRA97, homeowners could roll over profits into a new home or take a one-time $125,000 exclusion at age 55. Congress replaced that system with fixed caps — high at the time, but untouched since 1997.
However, according to Moody’s Analytics, nearly three decades of appreciation have made those caps woefully inadequate. If the exclusions had been indexed to consumer inflation, they’d be $500,000/$1,000,000 today. If indexed to home price growth, they’d be $885,000/$1,775,000 — almost triple.
This widening gap between policy and reality is at the heart of the capital gains tax impact home sellers now face in Santa Cruz.
When you sell your home (or any assent) for more than you paid, the difference is your capital gain — and that’s what gets taxed.
Here’s the reality check for Santa Cruz homeowners. When your home has appreciated by a million dollars or more, even these so-called "lower" tax rates translate into a life-changing, six-figure bill.
And in California, the math gets even tougher. The California Chamber of Commerce confirms the state's top income tax rate is now 14.4% — rose from 13.3% to 14.4% as of January 1, 2024. When you combine that with federal rates and the 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT), sellers can easily lose 35–38% of their taxable gain to taxes.
This isn't just a number on a page. It's the defining capital gains tax home selling challenge that forces many families to make an impossible choice: take a massive financial loss or stay put in a home that no longer fits their life.
When the IRS set the $250,000/$500,000 exclusion in 1997, it was meant to simplify recordkeeping and protect most homeowners. But in high-growth regions like Santa Cruz, it hasn’t kept pace.
If indexed to inflation, the caps would now be $500,000/$1,000,000. If indexed to home price growth (as Moody’s estimates), they’d be $885,000/$1,775,000. That’s a massive difference — and it shows why the exclusion, while generous 30 years ago, no longer shields the typical Santa Cruz seller.
It’s not just a financial hit — it’s the reason many homes never reach the market.
Consider these hypothetical scenarios:
A couple in Capitola bought their home back in 1989 for $180,000. That same home is now worth close to $1.9 million.
After using their $500,000 married couple exclusion, they're still looking at a taxable gain of over $1.2 million. The math doesn't lie—that could mean a combined tax bill pushing $400,000.
Suddenly, the dream of downsizing to a manageable Aptos condo doesn't pencil out. That tax bill would wipe out the equity they need for a comfortable retirement. So, what do they do? They stay put. And their family-sized home stays off the market for a young family that needs it.
Consider a widow in Soquel who recently inherited her family’s longtime home. She dreams of moving closer to her children, but there’s a major roadblock: because the property doesn’t meet the Primary Residence Rule, she isn’t eligible for the $500,000 exclusion.
If she sells now, the capital gains tax on that sale would consume a significant portion of her retirement savings — money she needs for security and independence. Faced with that kind of loss, she makes the only practical choice: she waits. Like many others across Santa Cruz County, she’s hoping for a policy update or relying on the potential step-up in basis her heirs could receive later on.
These stories are a perfect example of the boomers selling home tax implications we see every day—a financial trap that's personally painful for them and directly freezing supply across Santa Cruz County.

This tax dilemma isn’t just a line on a spreadsheet — it’s shaping how we live here in Santa Cruz. Here’s what it really means for you and your neighbors:
Economists call this the “lock-in effect.” For Santa Cruz, it’s visible in every neighborhood — from Seabright to Aptos. As a result, Santa Cruz property market trends have occasionally shown unusually low turnover rates compared to other California metros.
The provided text discusses two ballot measures from the City of Santa Cruz aimed at generating funds for affordable housing and climate resilience.
Both measures sought to address housing and homelessness issues through local taxation.
A parcel tax is a tax levied by a local government (like a city, school district, or special district) on each unit of property, known as a "parcel," within its jurisdiction.
A real estate transfer tax (also called a documentary transfer tax or conveyance tax) is a one-time tax charged by a state, county, and/or city government when ownership of a property is officially transferred from one party (the seller) to another (the buyer).
In summary, the City of Santa Cruz was attempting to use two different types of local taxes—a small, annual, flat fee (Parcel Tax) and a large, one-time tax on high-end home sales (Transfer Tax)—to create a dedicated revenue stream for their housing and climate goals. These type of local tax measures are sure to be followed by other cities throughout the state.
Looking ahead to the Santa Cruz real estate 2026 cycle, buyers should prepare for a market still shaped by policy inertia.
Here’s what to expect:
Policy experts argue that reforming the capital gains tax impact home sellers could release much-needed inventory — but timing matters.
If you’re planning to buy in 2026, stay flexible, monitor Santa Cruz housing market 2026 updates, and be ready to act fast when listings appear.
Here’s how you can navigate it.
What is capital gains tax and how does it work? It’s a tax on the profit made when selling a home or other asset. For Santa Cruz homeowners, exclusions of $250,000 (single) or $500,000 (married) apply if you’ve lived there two of the last five years. Beyond that, the gain may be taxed federally and by the state.
What are the 2026 capital gains tax rates? Federal long-term rates range from 0% to 20%, depending on income. California adds up to 14.4% for top earners. Always check the IRS and California Franchise Tax Board for current brackets.
How does capital gains tax affect home sellers in Santa Cruz? With homes appreciating by over $1 million since the 1990s, most sellers now exceed the federal exclusion — creating large taxable gains and discouraging sales.
Can baby boomers avoid paying capital gains tax when selling their homes? Completely? Rarely. But there are strategies to how to avoid capital gains tax legally — like timing, increasing your cost basis through improvements, and ensuring eligibility for the exclusion.
How will the 2026 capital gains tax changes impact Santa Cruz buyers? If exclusions are expanded or indexed, more homes could enter the market — easing pressure on buyers but possibly altering pricing patterns.
How can sellers minimize capital gains tax liability on Santa Cruz property? Keep receipts for improvements, consult a CPA, and explore installment or 1031 exchange options (when eligible). See local specialists listed below.
Are there exemptions or exclusions for capital gains tax on primary residences? Yes. The $250,000/$500,000 exclusion remains the key benefit — though many experts argue it should be updated to reflect modern housing prices.
The capital gains tax Santa Cruz situation isn’t just a fiscal issue — it’s reshaping who can move, who can buy, and how communities evolve.
Without reform, thousands of baby boomers real estate owners will remain “locked in,” leaving fewer opportunities for younger families and first-time buyers.
If you’re buying or selling in 2026, the key is to plan early, understand your tax exposure, and work with professionals who know both the numbers and the nuances of the Santa Cruz real estate 2026 landscape.
At David Lyng Real Estate, we help homeowners and buyers alike navigate these complexities — ensuring your next move, whenever it happens, is grounded in strategy and fact.
Paul Burrowes, CRS, CCEC, SFR, NHCP, LHC, REALTOR®
Paul Burrowes is a REALTOR® with more than fifteen years of experience and a long list of credentials, including CRS, CCEC, SFR, NHCP, and LHC. He promises to be prompt and forthright and serves as your personal adviser during the transaction, answering your questions and guiding you to the best possible choices. He is skilled at negotiating and strives for a win-win solution. Paul ensures that every little detail is taken care of so that the real estate transaction goes off without a hitch. Contact Paul Burrowes at paul@burrowes.com, (831) 295-5130, or DRE# 01955563; he proudly serves the counties of Santa Cruz, Monterey, Santa Clara, and Silicon Valley.
Carl F Worden III
Author, Educator, Tax Deferral Consultant
Tax Deferral Strategies LLC
www.DeferTax.com
www.StartAnExchange.com
3031 Tisch Way Suite 901
San Jose, CA. 95128
TF: 877-TAX-STRATEGY (877-829-7872)
PH: 408-261-2275
Ron Ricard
Account Executive, VP
IPX1031
ron.ricard@sis.ipx1031.com
(408) 483-1031
Work | (877) 747-7875
www.ipx1031.com/ricard
Thomas Foster, Esq., President
Nationwide 1031 Exchange Intermediary Services
331 Soquel Avenue, Suite 100
Santa Cruz, CA 95062
Office: 831-464-1031 (landline only)
Claire: 805-550-1410 (cell & text)
Tom: 408-499-4594 (cell & text)
tom@coast1031.com
AB 130 (2025)
Summary: Establishes CEQA exemptions for infill housing projects that meet local zoning and are not located on sensitive environmental sites. This speeds up approvals and reduces legal barriers for urban development.
Streamlining CEQA means faster project delivery and more homes entering the market sooner. More inventory benefits buyers, sellers, and agents alike. It also provides certainty for builders considering infill projects, especially in constrained metro areas.
SB 131 (2025)
Summary: Companion to AB 130, this bill further expands CEQA streamlining and limits litigation delays for qualifying housing and infrastructure projects.
By reducing the risk of lawsuits that stall development, this measure keeps housing projects on schedule. Benefit from increased housing stock, particularly in high-demand areas where new construction often faces lengthy environmental review battles.
SB 484 (2025)
Summary: Creates a pilot program allowing 100% affordable infill housing in select coastal zones to bypass coastal development permit requirements.
While it helps produce affordable units in high-cost coastal areas, it may also limit private-market opportunities in those zones by favoring nonprofit developers. from increased affordability and workforce stability in these coastal communities.
SB 79 (2025) – Abundant & Affordable Homes Near Transit Act
Summary: Allows higher-density housing near major transit stops by overriding restrictive local zoning, promoting transit-oriented development (TOD).
More density near transit increases available housing in job-rich regions, potentially boosting sales and rentals. Infrastructure impacts may affect neighborhood desirability or parking availability.
AB 253 (2025)
Summary: Requires cities and counties to publicly post permit fees and timelines and allows third-party plan reviews if jurisdictions delay housing projects.
Improves transparency and predictability for builders and property owners, reducing costly permitting delays. Review project timelines and costs, encouraging investment and redevelopment in sluggish jurisdictions.
AB 413 (2025)
Summary: Directs HCD to translate key housing and grant program materials into multiple languages, ensuring broader community and developer participation.
Expands access to state housing programs among diverse populations, helping REALTORS® serve multilingual clients more effectively. May also open opportunities for developers and homeowners from non-English-speaking backgrounds to participate in housing incentive programs.
AB 507 (2025)
Summary: Expands “use-by-right” adaptive reuse, allowing vacant commercial or office buildings to be converted into housing in any zoning district without discretionary approval.
Creates new housing opportunities from empty retail and office spaces. Developers and investors with conversion projects, revitalize downtowns, and help communities repurpose underutilized properties into livable spaces.
AB 648 (2025)
Summary: Allows community colleges to develop student and staff housing on their own land without local zoning restrictions.
Addresses housing needs for education professionals and students, stabilizing local rental markets. Potential increased housing transactions in surrounding areas and new partnerships with educational institutions pursuing mixed-use housing models.
SB 131 (Budget Trailer Housing Package)
Summary: A broader state reform integrating CEQA streamlining, faster permitting, and reduced litigation into the state budget framework.
Encourages consistent implementation of housing acceleration policies across state agencies, cutting red tape and uncertainty that often delay projects and transactions. Benefits from increased housing supply and smoother development processes.
AB 130/SB 131 Package (June 2025)
Summary: Together, these bills form the cornerstone of California’s 2025 housing acceleration strategy—targeting environmental review reform, zoning streamlining, and litigation reduction.
By attacking multiple production barriers simultaneously, this package boosts long-term housing availability, expands the market for sales and rentals, and helps meet client needs in areas currently constrained by regulation.
Shutdown: A federal government shutdown
Can disrupt real estate transactions by delaying IRS tax transcript processing, FHA and VA loan endorsements, and USDA loan programs. Flood insurance renewals may also be affected. While Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae continue operations, backlogs.
Federal agencies create uncertainty and slowdowns. REALTORS® should prepare clients for possible delays in closings and financing.